<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ruslawonline</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Российское право онлайн</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Russian Law Online</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2542-2472</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Московский государственный юридический университет имени О. Е. Кутафина (МГЮА)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17803/2542-2472.2022.24.4.095-104</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">ruslawonline-86</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>МИР</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>WORLD</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Соматическое право на искусственную репродукцию путем использования суррогатного материнства: компаративистский анализ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The Somatic Right to Artificial Reproduction Through Surrogacy: Comparative Analysis</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ткаченко</surname><given-names>А. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Tkachenko</surname><given-names>A. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Ткаченко Артем Андреевич, аспирант кафедры информационного права и цифровых технологи</p><p>125993, г. Москва, Садовая-Кудринская ул., д. 9</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Artem A. Tkachenko, Postgraduate Student, Department of IT Law and Digital Technologies</p><p>9 Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya Str, Moscow, 125933</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">artyomgg1@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Московский государственный юридический университет имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА)</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2022</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>02</day><month>03</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>95</fpage><lpage>104</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Ткаченко А.А., 2024</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Ткаченко А.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Tkachenko A.A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://ruslawonline.msal.ru/jour/article/view/86">https://ruslawonline.msal.ru/jour/article/view/86</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье представлен компаративистский анализ российских нормативных правовых актов и актов международных организаций и ЕС в сфере права на искусственную репродукцию путем использования суррогатного материнства. Целью этой статьи является анализ российской и международной практики нормативно-правового регулирования суррогатного материнства. В работе используются аналитический и сравнительной правовой методы. В статье даны краткий анализ российской правовой базы суррогатного материнства и описание практики проведения соответствующей процедуры. Также проанализирована практика международных межправительственных и профессиональных организаций по вопросам определения суррогатного материнства, лиц, участвующих в соответствующей процедуре, прав этих лиц в соответствии с основополагающими документами в сфере прав человека. Рассматриваются практика ООН и основные документы его органов в указанной сфере, также дается информация по вопросам защиты прав женщин и детей из отчетов и докладов, представленных в рамках деятельности региональных организаций ООН. Проанализирована соответствующая практика европейских региональных международных организаций, таких как Совет Европы. Дополнительно проанализирована практика ЕС как международной организации региональной интеграции с уникальной компетенцией, которая в том числе касается вопросов суррогатного материнства. Также представлена практика Суда ЕС как основного судебного органа ЕС в сфере рассмотрения вопросов компетенции ЕС. В конце работы делается вывод о необходимости разработки и принятия комплексного подхода к правовому регулированию процедуры суррогатного материнства, где на первом месте должны стоять интересы и здоровье ребенка, рожденного в рамках соответствующей процедуры.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article presents a comparative analysis of Russian normative legal acts and instruments of international organizations and the EU in the field of the right to artificial reproduction through the use of surrogacy. The purpose of this article is to analyze the Russian and international practice of legal regulation of surrogacy. Methodologically, the study is based on analytical and comparative legal methods. The content of the article provides a brief analysis of the Russian legal framework of surrogacy and a description of the practice of performing the appropriate procedure. The author analyzes the practice of international intergovernmental and professional organizations on the issues of defining surrogacy, persons participating in the relevant procedure, the rights of these persons under the fundamental documents in the field of human rights. The article examines the practice of the UN and the main documents of the UN bodies in this area. The author provides information from reports concerning protection of the rights of women and children submitted within the framework of the activities of regional UN organizations. The relevant practice of European regional international organizations, such as the Council of Europe, is also analyzed. Additionally, the paper analyzes the practice of the EU as an international organization of regional integration with a unique competence that also concerns surrogacy. The practice of the Court of Justice of the EU as the main judicial body of the EU in the field of consideration of issues of competence of the EU is elucidated. To sum up, it is concluded that it is necessary to develop and adopt an integrated approach to the legal regulation of the surrogacy procedure, where the interests and health of the child born as a result of the relevant procedure should be of primary importance.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>право</kwd><kwd>законодательство</kwd><kwd>судебная практика</kwd><kwd>соматические права</kwd><kwd>международное право</kwd><kwd>европейское право</kwd><kwd>международная организация</kwd><kwd>суд</kwd><kwd>суррогатное материнство</kwd><kwd>искусственная репродукция</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>law</kwd><kwd>legislation</kwd><kwd>judicial practice</kwd><kwd>somatic rights</kwd><kwd>international law</kwd><kwd>European law</kwd><kwd>international organization</kwd><kwd>court</kwd><kwd>surrogacy</kwd><kwd>artificial reproduction</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Développements juridiques présentant un intérêt pour l›Union européenne (2014) // Direction générale de la Bibliothèque, Recherche et Documentation CURIA. — URL: https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/201407/reflets.02.2014.pdf (дата обращения: 01.12.2022).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Développements juridiques présentant un intérêt pour l›Union européenne (2014). Direction générale de la Bibliothèque, Recherche et Documentation CURIA. Available at: https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/201407/reflets.02.2014.pdf [Accessed 01.08.2022].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Infertility // World Health Organization. — URL: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infertility (дата обращения: 01.12.2022).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Infertility. World Health Organization. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infertility [Accessed 01.08.2022].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Regulating international surrogacy arrangements — state of play (2016) // European Parliament. — URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/regdata/etudes/brie/2016/571368/ipol_bri(2016)571368_en.pdf (дата обращения: 01.12.2022).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Regulating international surrogacy arrangements — state of play (2016). European Parliament. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2016/571368/ IPOL_BRI (2016)571368_EN.pdf [Accessed 01.08.2022].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Reproductive Rights are Human Rights. A handbook for national Human Rights institutions (2014) // UNFPA. — URL: https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/nhrihand-book.pdf (дата обращения: 01.12.2022).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Reproductive Rights are Human Rights. A handbook for national Human Rights institutions (2014). UNFPA. Available at: https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/NHRIHandbook.pdf [Accessed 01.08.2022].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Study of Directorate — General for Internal Policies «A comparative study on the regime of surrogacy in EU Member States» (2013) // European Parliament. — URL: https://www.eu-roparl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=ipol-juri_et(2013)474403 (дата обращения: 01.12.2022).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Study of Directorate — General for Internal Policies “A comparative study on the regime of surrogacy in EU Member States” (2013). European Parliament. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=IPOL-JURI_ET(2013)474403 [Accessed 01.08.2022].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Surrogacy // Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority. — URL: https://www.hfea.gov.uk/treatments/explore-all-treatments/surrogacy/ (дата обращения: 01.12.2022).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Surrogacy. Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority. Available at: https://www.hfea.gov.uk/treatments/explore-all-treatments/surrogacy / [Accessed 01.08.2022].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Thomale С. State of play of cross-border surrogacy arrangements. Is there a case for regulatory intervention by the EU? // Journal of Private International Law. — 2017. — № 13 (2). — P. 463–473.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Thomale C. State of play of cross-border surrogacy arrangements. Is there a case for regulatory intervention by the EU? Journal of Private International Law. 2017;13(2):463-473.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wade K. The regulation of surrogacy: a children›s rights perspective // Child Fam Law Q. — 2017. — № 29 (2). — P. 113–131.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wade K. The regulation of surrogacy: a children›s rights perspective. Child Fam Law Q. 2017;29(2):113-131.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
