Dual-circuit penitentiary model of the PRC
https://doi.org/10.17803/2542-2472.2024.32.4.045-051
Abstract
China attracts attention not only because of its production facilities and sociotechnical solutions, but also due to its original goal-setting. In the PRC, the party took responsibility for building a moderately prosperous socialist society, for creating a new world order. Chinese-style modernization is the comprehensive deepening of reforms through the systemic integration of the most multidirectional principles. In the PRC, they like to combine a variety of goal-setting, calling them «five in one,» «four comprehensive measures,» etc. Chinese ideologists proceed from the fact that only the emancipation of the mind and the promotion of new ideas can contribute to better adaptation of industrial relations and labor productivity, development of national management and social development. Progress, constant reforms, openness, the legacy of Mao Zedong and the ideas of Deng Xiaoping — how do these so multidirectional concepts combine in Chinese ideology? The paper examines the implementation of this Taoist-Confucian-Marxist dialectic using the example of the penal system of the PRC. The purpose of the article: to study the features of educational work with convicts in the Chinese penitentiary system. The research methodology relies on international legal analysis of the regulation of the rights and freedoms of persons serving sentences, on media analytics of self-representations of Chinese penitentiary institutions. The study examines the challenges and practices of optimizing the experience of the penitentiary services in organizing educational, social and patriotic work with employees for informational purposes, because it is likely that China will act as a new model of stability in the current geopolitical situation.
About the Author
A. S. TimoshchukRussian Federation
Aleksey S. Timoshchuk, Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Professor, Department of Humanities and Socio-Economic Disciplines
Vladimir
References
1. Prosekov SA. Features of the fight against antisocial phenomena in China. Humanities. Bulletin of the University of Finance. 2018;8-2(32):93-94. (In Russ.).
2. Reent YuA. The criminal punishment system of China at the beginning of the 21st century: a view from the side. A Man: Crime and Punishment. 2013;3(82):175-179. (In Russ.).
3. Timofeeva EA. Features of the functioning of the penitentiary system of the People’s Republic of China at the present stage. Bulletin of the Samara Law Institute. 2016;3(21):75-81.
4. Bejesky R. Falun Gong & (and) Re-Education through Labor: Traditional Rehabilitation for the Misdirected to Protect Societal Stability within China’s Evolving Criminal Justice. Columbia Journal of Asian Law. 2004;17:2. Available: https://doi.org/10.7916/cjal.v17i2.3223 [Accessed 20.12.2024]. (In Russ.).
5. Cai D. Introduction to the Administrative Penalty Law of China. Columbia Journal of Asian Law. 1996;10(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.7916/cjal.v10i1.3150 [Accessed 20.12.2024].
6. Wu H. The need to restrain China. Journal of International Affairs. 1996;49(2):355-360. Contemporary China: The Consequences of Change (Winter 1996).
7. Zenz A. Innovating penal labor: Reeducation, forced labor, and coercive social integration in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. The China Journal. 2023. DOI: 10.1086/725494.
Review
For citations:
Timoshchuk A.S. Dual-circuit penitentiary model of the PRC. Russian Law Online. 2024;(4):45-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2542-2472.2024.32.4.045-051