Organization and Conduct of Elections in the Context of Hybrid Warfare
https://doi.org/10.17803/2542-2472.2025.34.2.005-015
Abstract
Enforcing the voting rights and freedoms of citizens is a fundamental task for any democratic state, particularly amid undeclared hybrid wars. In analyzing the specific characteristics of electoral procedures’ organization in contemporary con texts, the author identifies the subjects, objects, objectives, and forms of hybrid war fare, as well as their impact on the electoral process and potential countermeasures. The author concludes that, unlike military conflicts, hybrid wars de jure lack a defin itive victor and will persist indefinitely, exhibiting varying degrees of intensity across different spheres of social relations. Moreover, during the organization and conduct of elections and referendums, it will be necessary to introduce specialized legal ap proaches to the regulation of electoral procedures and methods for their implemen tation. These measures are essential to ensure electoral sovereignty and to safeguard the electoral rights and freedoms of citizens comprehensively, especially under chal lenging conditions of external influence. The paper explores practical directions for countering interference in elections and ensuring electoral sovereignty.
About the Author
I. B. BorisovRussian Federation
Igor B. Borisov, Cand. Sci. (Law), Member of the Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation, Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation
References
1. Avakyan SA. Constitutional Law of Russia: A Course of Study. 2 vols. 2nd revised ed. Moscow: Yurist Publ.; 2007. (In Russ.).
2. Goloskokov LV. Criminal Law and Hybrid Wars. Journal of Applied Research. 2020;4:52-57. (In Russ.).
3. Goloskokov LV. Vulnerability of the Modern Criminal Legal System of Russia from the Meth ods and Means of Conducting Hybrid Wars. Russian Journal of Legal Studies. 2020;7(3):30-44. (In Russ.).
4. Ivashchenko MA. On the Concept and Attributes of a Hybrid War. The Russian Investigator. 2021;12:39-41. (In Russ.).
5. Isaev IA. Independence and Sovereignity: A Realm of Alienation and Power. Moscow: Pros pekt Publ.; 2017. (In Russ.).
6. Krasinskiy VV. State Sovereignty: Epistemological Dimension of Problem. Sovremennoe pra vo. 2015;7:5-10. (In Russ.).
7. Krasinskiy VV. Constitutional and Legal Mechanism for the Protection of the Constitutional Order in the Electoral Process. Law and Education. 2010;6:81-88. (In Russ.).
8. Lukyanov VYu. Hybrid wars as a security threat in the 21st century. Vestnik of Northern (Arc tic) Federal University. Series «Humanitarian and Social Sciences». 2021;21(3):5-14. (In Russ.).
9. Potanina OV. The concepts of «hybrid threat» and «hybrid warfare» in political science re search. Proceedings of the National Scientific Forum for Master’s Students, Postgraduates, and Young Researchers. Vladivostok; 2023. (In Russ.).
10. Chistoborodov IG. Law Enforcement Agencies as Subjects of Ensuring Law and Order and Public Safety during Election Campaigns. Issues of Humanitarian Sciences. 2013;6:94-99. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Borisov I.B. Organization and Conduct of Elections in the Context of Hybrid Warfare. Russian Law Online. 2025;(2):5-15. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2542-2472.2025.34.2.005-015