Preview

Russian Law Online

Advanced search

The Heroic Myth of Commemorative Legislation

https://doi.org/10.17803/2542-2472.2026.37.1.024-037

Abstract

The paper presents the author’s conception of the role of the heroic myth of commemorative legislation in constructing frames of historical memory in Russia. On the basis of a comprehensive philosophical and legal study of Russian legislation, the author concludes that the normatively articulated heroic myth has a dichotomous legal nature. On the one hand, it makes explicit collective representations of the heroic past. On the other hand, it is intended to construct frames of historical memory necessary to sustain civic identity and national security. Accordingly, considerable attention is devoted to the principles governing the selection of historical figures to be memorialized, which are determined by the value orientations of the political elite, the external manifestation of which is found in strategic planning acts. Inclusion in the historical martyrology, understood by the author as the list of key historical figures identified in the text of commemorative laws as objects of commemoration and glorification, is limited to persons who performed a military and/or labor feat in the interests of society as a whole. At the same time, memorialization extends not only to specifically named individuals but also to certain social groups whose actions were heroic in character and contributed to the protection of national security in the past. The inclusion of the name of a historical figure or of a non-personified mnemonic nominative in the text of a normative legal act performs a number of interrelated functions: memorialization of the historical figure, constitution of the image of the historical figure, construction of a space of memory, educational and organizational functions, maintenance of civic identity, and the safeguarding of national security. Through specific examples, the author demonstrates that the heroic myth articulated in memorial legislation is of great significance for maintaining national security and civic identity in Russia.

About the Author

A. V. Skorobogatov
Kazan Innovation University named after V. G. Timiryasov
Russian Federation

Andrey V. Skorobogatov, Dr. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Theory of State and Law and Public Law Disciplines

Kazan



References

1. Bogdanov AP. Polish campaign A.V. Suvorov 1794: truth and myths. Historical Journal: Scientific Research. 2023;6:188-214. (In Russ.).

2. Galitskaya KA. The policy of national memory as a technology for legitimizing power. Discourse-Pi. 2021;1(42):48-61. (In Russ.).

3. Gigauri DI, Gutorov VA. Political myth in the structure of historical memory. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political Science. 2017;2:24-45. (In Russ.).

4. Goncharenko LN, Avakova EB. Historical self-identification of Russia: stages of formation and modern functions. Locus: People, Society, Cultures, Meanings. 2019;2:132-147. (In Russ.).

5. Gronsky A. Historical policy of Ukraine and Belarus and the formation of the image of the Russian commander Alexander Suvorov in 2014–2020. National Interest. 2022;XVII(43):153-168. (In Russ.).

6. Zhivov VM, Uspensky BA. Tsar and God: Semiotic aspects of the sacralization of the monarch in Russia. Languages of Culture and the Problem of Translability. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russ.).

7. Ivanova MV, Shabalina OV. Socio-economic aspects of the historical development of the Kola Peninsula. The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order. 2017;4(55):42-53. (In Russ.).

8. Isaev IA. Mythologies of the law: law and literature. Moscow: Prospekt Publ.; 2016. (In Russ.).

9. Kalutskov VN. Conceptualization of the geographical space of Russia and neighboring countries (according to the renaming of geographical objects). Proceedings of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Series Geography. 2021;85(6):924-935. (In Russ.).

10. Krasnova KA. Counteraction to the rehabilitation of Nazism as one of the tasks of ensuring the defense capability and national security of the Russian Federation. Military Law Journal. 2025;01:12-15. (In Russ.).

11. Moroz AB. Folk calendar and quasi-hagiography. Onomastics. 2007;4:59-66. (In Russ.).

12. Pashentsev DA. Effectiveness of legal norms in postmodern society. Journal of Russian Law. 2023;27(6):22-33. (In Russ.).

13. Podlesnaya MA, Shevchenko OK, Ilyina IV. Heroes and heroism as a representation of collective memory. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2023;23(3):503-524. (In Russ.).

14. Popov SA. Heroic memorials in the Russian toponymicon. Neophylology. 2021;7(28):596-604. (In Russ.).

15. Seredinskaya LA. The heroics of everyday life in modern society: the heroics of labor and the heroics of war. The Altai State University Journal. 2012;2-2(74). S. 221–224.

16. Tohirien ASh. Interpretation of the formation of historical memory in the image of a historical person. Modern Science: Current Problems of Theory and Practice. Series: Humanities. 2022;11:36-42.

17. Trofimova AV. Universal and historical semantics of the feat. Tomsk State University Bulletin. 2007;303:49-50. (In Russ.).

18. Shatilovich SN. Formation of the patriotic consciousness of students on the examples of the labor heroism of women during the Great Patriotic War of 1941–1945. The Bulletin of the Tyumen Institute for Advanced Studies of the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MVD) of Russia. 2020;1(14):32-36. (In Russ.).

19. Cembrzyńska P. «Pomnik nie może upamiętniać…»: O dekomunizacji przestrzeni publicznej. Historical Review. 2020;111(1):131-152.

20. Eco U. Function and Sign: Semiotics of Architecture. In: Gottdiener M, Lagopoulos APh. (eds.) The City and the Sign. An Introduction to Urban Semiotics. New York: Columbia University Press,; 1986.

21. Fonseca Sandoval J. D. Mitología jurídica en nuestra América: resignificar el discurso jurídico para un derecho intercultural. Revista Razón Crítica. 2020;8:79-112. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21789/25007807.1566.

22. Giesen B. Triumph and Trauma. (2004). London, New York: Routledge Publ. (In Russ.). 10.4324/9781315631455.

23. Humphrey C., Laidlaw J. Sacrifice and Ritualization, (2007). In: Kyriakidis E. The Archaeology of Ritual. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press at UCLA; 2007. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvdjrr7s.15

24. Inglis K. S. Entombing Unknown Soldiers: From London and Paris to Baghdad. History and Memory. 1993;5(2):7-31.

25. Lethbridge S. Aesthetics of Heroism. In Allison S. T., Beggan J. K., Goethals G. R. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Heroism Studies. Cham: Springer, 2024. P. 21–26. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-48129-1_156.

26. O’Reilly G. The Nexus between Geographical Naming, Place, and the Politics of Power. In: O’Reilly G. (eds.) Place Naming, Identities and Geography: Critical Perspectives in a Globalizing and Standardizing World. Cham: Springer; 2023;641-659. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-21510-0_28.

27. Rose-Redwood R, Alderman DE, Azaryahu M. (eds.). The Political Life of Urban Streetscapes: Naming, Politics and Place. London, New York: Routledge Publ.; 2018.


Review

For citations:


Skorobogatov A.V. The Heroic Myth of Commemorative Legislation. Russian Law Online. 2026;(1):24-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2542-2472.2026.37.1.024-037

Views: 83

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-2472 (Online)