On the Question of Patent Law
https://doi.org/10.17803/2542-2472.2026.37.1.151-157
Abstract
The paper substantiates the expediency of studying patent law within the framework of civil law theory, which ultimately makes it possible to develop practical proposals for optimizing the protection of the objects of so-called «industrial property»: inventions, utility models, industrial designs, trademarks and service marks, and appellations of origin. Attention is drawn to the fact that the dispositive principles of civil law are increasingly, for objective and readily understandable reasons, yielding to the category of public interest. At the same time, the author argues that these circumstances, together with the development of digital («machine») technologies, should not affect the fundamental approaches to the most important and universal regulator of social relations. Intellectual property law (as well as patent law studied in our department) should not become a «law of the machine»; moreover, the necessary balance between the interests of the human being and the «machine» (artificial intelligence, smart technologies, and the like), under which there might hypothetically emerge a «law of the human and the machine», is unlikely to be secured even in the future. Law must remain the «law of the human being».
About the Author
S. G. PavlokovRussian Federation
Sergei G. Pavlikov, Dr. Sci. (Law), Full Professor, Head of the Department of Patent Law and the Legal Protection of Means of Individualization
Moscow
References
1. Alekseychuk AA. Free use of the trademark. IP. Industrial Property. 2020;12:53-59. (In Russ.).
2. Andreev YuN. Judicial protection of exclusive rights: Civil Law Aspects. Moscow; 2011. (In Russ.).
3. Ankushina MYu. Free use of patent rights. IP. Industrial property. 2024;2:73-79. (In Russ.).
4. Bratus DA. Gongalo BM (ed.). Protection of copyright and related rights. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 2024. (In Russ.).
5. Bratus DV. Organizational copyrights. Gongalo B.M. (ed.). Moscow: Statut Publ.; 2022. (In Russ.).
6. Boltanova ES, Bagrova NV, Barishpolskaya TYu, et al. Boltanova ES (ed.). Civil law. General part. Moscow: Infra-M Publ.; 2023. (In Russ.).
7. Vorozhevich AS. Boundaries of exclusive rights to patentable objects. Journal of the Court for Intellectual Rights. 2018;21:29-45. (In Russ.).
8. Vorozhevich AS. The limits of the exercise and protection of the exclusive right of the patent holder. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 2018. (In Russ.).
9. Gorodov OA. Patent monopoly on the use of inventions. Competition Law. 2020;4:3-8. (In Russ.).
10. Krasavchikov OA. Creativity and civil law (concept, subject and composition of the subindustry). Jurisprudence. 1984. No. 4 (in modern edition: Civil Law Science Categories. Selected writings. In 2 vols. Vol. 2. 2nd ed. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 2017. (In Russ.).
11. Krivitskaya YuS. Conflict issues of transfer of patent rights to official objects during inheritance. Inheritance Law. 2024;3:21-23. (In Russ.).
12. Pazemova EI. Peculiarities of the implementation of the mechanism of compulsory licensing and other mechanisms for restricting the rights of copyright holders in the field of drug protection. Current problems of Russian Law. 2022;5:103. (In Russ.).
13. Pilenko AA. The right of the inventor. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 2001. (In Russ.).
14. Polyakova AA, Lyskov NB. Practice of restricting patent rights within the framework of Articles 1360 and 1362 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Bulletin of Federal Institute of Industrial Property. 2025;1:14-23. (In Russ.).
15. Badulina EV, Gavrilov DA, Grin ES, et al. Novoselova LA (ed.). Intellectual property law. Vol. 1: General Provisions. Moscow: Statut Publ.; 2017. (In Russ.).
16. Pushkin AS. Collected works: In 16 vol. Vol. 3. Poems, 1826–1836. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ.; 1948. (In Russ.).
17. Ruzakova OA. Development of legislation on the free use of patent law objects. Patents and Licenses. 2020;6:2-9. (In Russ.).
18. Sidorenko AI. Judicial doctrines in the field of intellectual rights in Russia and abroad. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law. 2021;3:100-115.
19. Sinitsyn SA. Comparative patent law: current problems. Institute of Legislation and Compar-ative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation. Moscow; 2022. (In Russ.).
20. Sukhanov EA. Property law: scientific and educational essay. 3rd ed. Moscow: Statute Publ.; 2024. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Pavlokov S.G. On the Question of Patent Law. Russian Law Online. 2026;(1):151-157. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2542-2472.2026.37.1.151-157
JATS XML