Two Russian Agrarian Reforms: Historical and Legal Parallels
https://doi.org/10.17803/2542-2472.2022.24.4.116-123
Abstract
The article presents a comparative characteristic of the agrarian reform of P. A. Stolypin and the agrarian reform in post-Soviet Russia; the reasons for these reforms are analyzed, their goals and objectives are compared. The authors determine problematic aspects of both reforms and their strong features. The study highlights the relevance of this comparative characteristic. It identified positive aspects of the reform of P. A. Stolypin. According to the authors, positive aspects demonstrate how far-sighted the reformer was in solving the agrarian issue and in general softening the political situation in the country, which was facilitated by the «resettlement policy». The paper pays special attention to the post-Soviet development of the agricultural sector of the economy that took place due to the need to establish ways of transferring state property that was used by the population on the ground of the right of usage that was the embodiment of market transformations that affected the economy in the 1990s during the collapse of the USSR. The authors highlight that a common positive feature of both reforms is the expansion of the rights of land users. Under the Stolypin reform, peasants could become landowners, and in this case they became motivated to work. The same thing happened in post-Soviet Russia: citizens of the Russian Federation in the 1990s also became landowners, they had the right to independently dispose of their land. The shortcomings of the reforms are not at all similar — in the first case, the state was not ready for the mass resettlement of peasants to the East, the reactionary and conservative thinking of the community, and in the second case, it could not create a single body controlling the sphere of land relations.
Keywords
About the Authors
E. F. ShamsumovaRussian Federation
Emma F. Shamsumova, Cand. sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of History of State and Law
21 Komsomolskaya Str, Yekaterinburg, 620137
D. V. Belyaev
Russian Federation
Danila V. Belyaev, Undergraduate Student
21 Komsomolskaya Str, Yekaterinburg, 620137
V. S. Fedorov
Russian Federation
Vadim S. Fedorov, Undergraduate Student
21 Komsomolskaya Str, Yekaterinburg, 620137
References
1. Belokopytova NYu. Zakonodatelnye osnovy agrarnoy reformy P. A. Stolypina [Legislative bases of agrarian reform P. A. Stolypin]. North Caucasian Legal Vestnik. 2009;4:21-25. (In Russ.).
2. Voronin BA, et al. Zemelno-agrarnaya reforma P. A. Stolypina i razvitie selskogo khozyaystva v sovremennoy Rossii [Land and agrarian reform of P. A. Stolypin and the development of agriculture in modern Russia]. Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals. 2016;10(152):81-82. (In Russ.).
3. Zharikov YuG, et al. Zemelnoe pravo Rossii [Land Law of Russia]. Moscow: Bylina Publ.; 1997. (In Russ.).
4. Zyryanov PN. Petr Stolypin: politicheskiy portret [Pyotr Stolypin: a political portrait]. Moscow: Higher School Publ.; 1992. (In Russ.).
5. Ignatov D. Pereselencheskaya tyaga [Resettlement thrust]. Krestjanskoe zemledelie. 1908;16:457-458. (In Russ.).
6. Lipsky SA. Zemelnaya reforma v postsovetskoy Rossii [Land reform in Post-Soviet Russia]. Economic Journal. 2013;3(31):139-148. (In Russ.).
7. Milov LV, et al. Istoriya Rossii XX — do nachala XXI v. [The history of Russia 20th — to the beginning of the 21st century]. Moscow: Eksmo Publ.; 2006. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Shamsumova E.F., Belyaev D.V., Fedorov V.S. Two Russian Agrarian Reforms: Historical and Legal Parallels. Russian Law Online. 2022;(4):116-123. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2542-2472.2022.24.4.116-123