Artificial Intelligence as the Object of Legal Regulation
https://doi.org/10.17803/2542-2472.2023.27.3.011-024
Abstract
The paper attempts to explain the debatable issues of the need for effective regulation of relations using artificial intelligence (AI). The author examines the legislative and theoretical understanding of the content of the concept of AI, the approaches and characteristics prevailing in Russian and foreign legal literature and identifies some problems of the lag of the national industry from global indicators in the context of AI development. The author attempts to determine the methodology of the phenomenon under study. The paper introduces a special legal regime involving the joint regulation of relations using AI. It is emphasized that new forms of social relations must be integrated into the existing matrix, preventing introduction of heterogeneous concepts that blur the subject, method, and system. The paper analyzes standings of domestic and foreign courts. At the same time, within the framework of the study, the author analyzed theoretical and practical aspects that showed «painfulness» of the issues under consideration. A number of conflict-of-laws problems has been identified. The solution of these problems is possible only with proper characterization and scientific understanding of public relations. The author has made specific proposals aimed at improving legislation in the field of ways of interacting with debtors. The paper provides for examination of approaches to the expediency of granting artificial intelligence the status of a subject or object of a legal relationship. Conclusions and provisions explain the author’s understanding of the problem and a proposal to develop a new scientific legal category «innovative potential of law». The author focuses attention on the need to develop a special federal law regulating relations containing such an element as artificial intelligence, primarily categorizing the corresponding conceptual and categorical apparatus and defining its possible structural elements.
Keywords
About the Author
D. P. OsipovRussian Federation
Daniil P. Osipov, Student
9, Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya St., Moscow 125933
References
1. The Australian court confirmed the right of the neural network to obtain a patent. RBC. Available at: https://trends.rbc.ru/trends/industry/6109576b9a794779eed90de8 [Accessed 01.09.2023]. (In Russ.).
2. Vavilin EV. Artificial intelligence as a participant in civil relations: the transformation of law. Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2021;42:135-146. (In Russ.).
3. Gabov AV, Yavanova IA. The evolution of labor and law of the XXI century. Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2018;435:215-233. (In Russ.).
4. WIPO discussion on «Intellectual Property (IP) and Intellectual Intelligence (AI)». May 21, 2020. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/mdocs/ru/wipo_ip_ai_2_ge_20/wipo_ip_ai_2_ge_20_1_rev.pdf [Accessed 01.09.2023].
5. Laptev VA. The concept of artificial intelligence and legal responsibility for its work. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2019;2:79-102. (In Russ.).
6. Locke D. Letter to the reader. In: Essays in 3 volumes. Vol. 1. Experience of human understanding. (Philosophical Heritage. Vol. 93). Moscow: Mysl Publ.; 1985. (In Russ.).
7. Minbaleev AV. The legal basis for the use of artificial intelligence. In: Podshivalov TP, Titov EV, Gromov EA (eds.). The Law of the digital environment. Available at: https://www.garant.ru [Accessed 01.09.2023]. (In Russ.).
8. Minbaleev AV. Problems of digital law. S.: Amirit Publ.; 2022. (In Russ.).
9. Morkhat PM. Artificial intelligence: a legal view. Moscow: Buki Vedi Publ.; 2017. (In Russ.).
10. Naumov VB, Kamalova GG. Issues of constructing legal definitions in the field of artificial intelligence. Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2020;15(1):81-93. (In Russ.).
11. RSUH proposed to restrict access to the chatbot CHATGPT that has written the thesis. RBC. Available at:https://www.rbc.ru/technology_and_media/01/02/2023/63da66c19a7947f79e7c2d54?ysclid=lgj2e4t2vp532247592 [Accessed 01.09.2023].
12. Dal VI. Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian language: in 4 volumes. Vol. II, Vil. IV. Moscow: Russkij yazyk Publ.; 1991. (In Russ.).
13. Vasilevskaya LYu (ed.). Digitalization of civil turnover: problems and development trends (civil law research). In 5 vol. Vol. 1. Moscow: Prospect Publ.; 2022. (In Russ.).
14. Blazheyev VV, Egorova MA (eds.) Digital law: textbook. Moscow: Prospect Publ.; 2021. (In Russ.).
15. Shershenevich GF. Textbook of Russian civil law: (Editions of 1912 and 1914–1915): in 2 volumes. (Classics of Russian civilization.). T. I. Moscow: Statute Publ.; 2021.
16. Avis relatif à l’impact de l’intelligence artificielle sur les droits fondamentaux (A-2022-6). legifrance.gouv.fr. Available at: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000045593731 [Accessed 01.09.2023].
17. Full translation: Chinese «New Generation Artificial Intelligence Development Plan» (2017). New America. Available at: https://www.newamerica.org/cybersecurity-initiative/digichina/blog/full-translation-chinas-new-generation-artificial-intelligence-development-plan-2017 / [Accessed 01.09.2023].
Review
For citations:
Osipov D.P. Artificial Intelligence as the Object of Legal Regulation. Russian Law Online. 2023;(3):11-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2542-2472.2023.27.3.011-024