The Procedural Role of Participants in the Civil Procedure and the Function of the Banking System in Securing a Claim
https://doi.org/10.17803/2542-2472.2025.33.1.050-060
Abstract
The paper examines the procedural distribution of roles among the participants in a dispute and other individuals whose rights and obligations may be affected by the implementation of the institute of securing a claim in civil procedural law.
The author analyzes the degree of activity of the court and the parties involved in the case when considering the merits of the case and when taking protective measures, in relation to the theories of civil and arbitrazh process construction and the degree of truth-seeking in the case. The author draws conclusions regarding the rules for assessing the grounds for securing a claim in related obligations, using banking legal relations as an example.
It is highlighted that the tasks of the court are not limited to resolving disputes but also aim to strengthen legality and prevent violations of the law. To achieve these objectives, the author proposes to introduce a mechanism for improving procedural legislation regulating application of the institute of securing a claim. This mechanism partially alters the rules for the distribution of powers among participants of court proceedings when a claim is secured. It is justified that these changes do not contradict the modern adversarial model of court proceedings due to the public law nature of the corresponding tasks of the court. It has been revealed that banks and other credit organizations can perform an auxiliary function in this context.
About the Author
S. V. Gavrichkov
«Glavnaya bukva» Law Firm;
Institute of State and Law, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Stanislav V. Gavrichkov, Advocate, Senior Partner, Glavnaya bukva» Law Firm; Postgraduate Student, Institute of State and Law, Russian Academy of Sciences
St. Petersburg
References
1. Bonner AT. Selected Works: in 7 volumes. Vol. IV: Problems of Establishing Truth in Civil Proceedings. Moscow: Prospekt Publ.; 2017. (In Russ.).
2. Vikut MA. Parties are the Main Persons in Claim Proceedings. Saratov; 1968. (In Russ.).
3. Gavrichkov SV. The Injunction to Pay under a Bank Guarantee as a Procedural Means of Interference in Guarantee Legal Relations. Aktual’nye problem rossijskogo prava. 2024;19(10):70-80. (In Russ.).
4. Barsukova VN, Solovyova TV. Civil Procedural Law of Russia (Introductory Provisions and Principles). Saratov: Saratov University Press, 2012. (In Russ.).
5. Tumanov DA. Does Modern Judicial Proceedings Need the Principle of Objective Truth? Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL). 2021;12:28-40. (In Russ.).
6. Treushnikov MK. Judicial Evidence. Moscow: Gorodets publ.; 2004. (In Russ.).
7. ikhaylova EV. Legal Status of the Parties in the Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation. Cand. Sci. (Law) Diss. Samara; 2004. (In Russ.).
8. Osokina GL. Civil Procedure. General Part. 3rd ed. Moscow: Norma Publ.; 2013. (In Russ.).
9. Yarkov VV. Proposals on the Concept, Structure, and Content of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (CPC RF). In: Treushnikov MK (ed.). The Path to the Law (Draft Documents, Explanatory Notes, Conference Proceedings, Draft Versions of the CPC, New CPC RF. Moscow: Gorodets Publ.; 2004. (In Russ.).
10. Yarkov VV. The Role of the Court in Establishing the Facts of the Case through the Prism of Professor A. T. Bonner’s Research. Herald of Civil Procedure. 2022;4:49-66. (In Russ.).
11. Yaltsov AA. Internal Judicial Conviction and Objective Criteria of Proof — Inseparable Elements of One System? Arbitration and Civil Procedure. 2020;9:36-42; 2020;10:31-36. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Gavrichkov S.V. The Procedural Role of Participants in the Civil Procedure and the Function of the Banking System in Securing a Claim. Russian Law Online. 2025;(1):50-60. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2542-2472.2025.33.1.050-060
Views:
82
Email this article 