Preview

Russian Law Online

Advanced search

The Constitutional Principle of Gender Equality and the Mythologemes of Patriarchy

https://doi.org/10.17803/2542-2472.2025.36.4.119-126

Abstract

The paper analyzes the mythologemes of patriarchy in contemporary Russia and globally in the context of the formal proclamation of gender equality alongside actual discrimination against men in legislation and law-enforcement practice. The author observes that the struggle for women’s rights has succeeded and should be recognized as a major achievement; however, a post-victory «war of women against men» is neither necessary nor desirable — society needs civil peace, including gender peace. Patriarchal mythologemes, as well as the converse practice of discrimination against men, create socio-legal problems in the family, labor, and other spheres of society; they adversely affect birth rates, life expectancy, quality of life, and the stability of marital and family relations. Modern society no longer accepts patriarchy, yet concern about infringements of men’s rights is not widely shared by the majority of the population. The author proposes a critical synthesis of constitutional and traditional values to secure genuine gender equality by reinterpreting traditional values in a modern context adapting them to current realities and legal foundations, and abandoning outdated concepts (for example, the notion of the «head of the family»). It is further argued that traditional values should be formalized by incorporating them into regulatory legal acts from the Constitution of the Russian Federation to sectoral legislation. In particular, the author recommends broader introduction of such norms and values into the Family Code of the Russian Federation. The paper advocates consistently ensuring true equality of men and women, i.e., equality of rights, freedoms, duties, and opportunities to realize them. Achieving this requires eliminating gender-based distinctions throughout the regulatory framework, except where objectively justified (for instance, in matters related to pregnancy and comparable issues).

About the Author

A. N. Chertkova
Corporate University for the Development of Education; Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after P. Lumumba (RUDN University)
Russian Federation

Alexander N. Chertkov, Dr. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor; Professor, Department of Management; Professor, Department of the Judiciary, Civil Society and Law Enforcement  

Moscow



References

1. Andreev AV. Problems of preserving the institution of the family in the Russian Federation. Bulletin of the Ural Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2021;4:97-99. (In Russ.).

2. Anna Kuznetsova for the introduction of mandatory pre-trial mediation in family disputes. Vladimir Regional Association of Mediators. Available at https://mediator33.ru/2020/11/24/anna-kuznecova-za-vvedenie-obyazatelnoj-dosudebnoj-mediacii-po-semejnym-sporam/ [Accessed 30.12.2025]. (In Russ.).

3. Borisova LV. Reconciliation upon divorce: in the aspect of preserving traditional Russian spiritual and moral values. Family and Housing Law. 2025;3:8-11. (In Russ.).

4. Gordiychuk NV. Features of Family Mediation In Divorce. Family Psychology and Psychotherapy. 2017;2:12-20. (In Russ.).

5. Ilyina OYu. Problems of interest in family law of the Russian Federation. Moscow: Gorodets Publ.; 2007. (In Russ.).

6. Isaev IA. Mythologies of the law: law and literature. Moscow: Prospekt Publ.; 2016. (In Russ.).

7. Karamanukyan DT. Legislative prerequisites for gender discrimination in the Russian Federation. Bulletin of the Omsk Law Academy. 2019;1:6-12. (In Russ.).

8. Kokova DA. Public and private legal nature of family legal relations. Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2025;2:234-250. (In Russ.).

9. Miller spoke about the idea of forced reconciliation of divorcing spouses. Available at: https://spb.mk.ru/social/2024/09/10/seksolog-miller-vyskazalas-ob-idee-prinuditelnogo-primireniya-razvodyashhikhsya-suprugov.html?ysclid=m1qawfiwn5428685378 [Accessed 30.12.2025]. (In Russ.).

10. Milokhova AV. Mandatory mediation: finding a compromise. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Economics. Management. Law. 2013;3(104):136-142. (In Russ.).

11. Russia ranked third in the number of divorces (80 % of marriages broke up in 2024 ). Available at: https://n-e-n.ru/Rossia-zanyala-tretie-mesto-po-kolichestvu-razvodov/ [Accessed 30.12.2025].

12. Seven cases when people entered into unusual marriages: from animals to park attractions. Available at: https://kulturologia.ru/blogs/090522/53243/ [Accessed 30.12.2025].

13. Stepanova L. Children in full families grow faster. Available at: https://www.missus.ru/arti-cles/family/psychology/18-05-2013/children/8343 [Accessed 30.12.2025].


Review

For citations:


Chertkova A.N. The Constitutional Principle of Gender Equality and the Mythologemes of Patriarchy. Russian Law Online. 2025;(4):119-126. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2542-2472.2025.36.4.119-126

Views: 231

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-2472 (Online)