Preview

Russian Law Online

Advanced search

«Elections in Khaki»: A Phenomenon or a Pattern?

https://doi.org/10.17803/2542-2472.2023.26.2.037-045

Abstract

The article abalyzes the term «elections in khaki» («khaki election»), which is widely found in the Anglo-American literature. In our opinion, it is not quite right to limit it to only one, the most commonly understood meaning as elections taking place during the war and (or) immediately after the war. This term has at least three meanings, which can be combined simultaneously even within the framework of one election campaign. In addition to the above-mentioned meaning, «elections in khaki» can also be understood as such elections when issues related to the war (its declaration, further course, end and related moments (general or partial mobilization, etc.)) are of major importance during the election campaign. Finally, «elections in khaki» can also include elections when, in conditions of mass armies with universal military service, combined with universal (at least male) suffrage, uniformed voters play an active and significant role. Although most of these elections took place during the world wars mainly in the countries that we refer to as the Westminster system and the United States, this is also typical for other major military conflicts in other countries of the world. There are a huge number of examples of this kind. Within the framework of this article, we preferred to limit ourselves to only some of the most striking examples of this kind: the elections to the Constituent Assembly in Russia at the end of 1917, parliamentary elections in Great Britain in 1900 and 1918, Canada (1917), Australia (1914 and 1916), etc.

About the Author

S. V. Chechelev
Dostoevskiy Omsk State University
Russian Federation

Stanislav V. Chechelev, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Theory of the State and Law of the Faculty of Law

100/1 50 let Profsoyuzov Str., Omsk, 644072 



References

1. Archive of the Russian Revolution published by Hesse: in 22 vols. Vol. 7. Moscow: TERRA Publ.; 1991. (In Russ.). 2. Goncharova ES. Suffragism in Great Britain as a factor of the First World War. Grani poznaniya. 2015;2(35):18-20. (In Russ.).

2. Parliamentary elections of 1918. History of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Available at: http://uk-history.ru/history/st190.shtml [Accessed 01.05.2023].

3. Protasov LG. All-Russian Constituent Assembly. The story of birth and death. Moscow: Rosspan Publ.; 1997. (In Russ.).

4. Churchill W. The global crisis. Moscow: Librocom Publ.; 2014. (In Russ.). 6. Churchill W. My early years 1874–1904. Moscow: Kolibri Publ.; 2012. (In Russ.).

5. Chechelev SV. Congress of the Confederate States of America: features of organization and activities. Pravopriminenie. 2017;1(3):27-34. (In Russ.).

6. Chikaleva IR. Parties, trade unions, women’s organizations in France, Germany, Great Britain (1815–1914). Minsk: Belorusskaya navuka, 2015. Available at: https://biblioclub.ru/index.php?page=book&id=436792 [Accessed 01.05.2023]. (In Russ.).

7. 1900 General Election. Spartacus Educational. Available at: https://spartacus-educational. com/GE1900.htm [Accessed 01.05.2023].

8. Papkin JD. The Third Republic. Available at: https://www.britannica.com/place/France/ The-Third-Republic [Accessed 01.05.2023].

9. Scott E. Official History of Australia in the War of 1914–1918: Volume XI — Australia During the War. 7th edition, 1941. Australian War Memorial. Available at: https://www.awm.gov.au/ collection/C1416945 [Accessed 01.05.2023].

10. Toye R. Churchill’s W. «Crazy Broadcast»: Party, Nation, and the 1945 Gestapo Speech. The Journal of British Studies. 2010;49(3):655-680. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Chechelev S.V. «Elections in Khaki»: A Phenomenon or a Pattern? Russian Law Online. 2023;(2):37-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2542-2472.2023.26.2.037-045

Views: 78


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-2472 (Online)